THINK ABOUT THIS, OR DON’T, YOUR CHOICE

If masks are effective, why can’t we visit friends and relatives in hospitals and nursing homes if we wear them?

If masks are not effective why are we ordered to wear them?

Are we still a “FREE COUNTRY” if the government is allowed to order some businesses not to open because they are deemed “NON ESSENTIAL?”

Why were BLM protests allowed when gathering in churches was not?

Why was air travel allowed while eating in restaurants was not?

Are we still a “FREE COUNTRY” if the government is allowed to limit access to religious services for over a year? I’m still going to “parking lot” masses on Sundays.

How many people are aware that Covid 19 is 97% curable?

How many people are aware that there is a large contingent of doctors who tried to speak out against mandatory masks and were silenced?

Why are schools just starting to open over one year after they were closed even though children are the least effected group?

Why were accident, cancer and shooting fatalities listed as Covid deaths in many documented cases?

Why did Fauci say masks were not effective before he said they were?

Why is Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez allowed to say, “We’re going to have to figure out how we rein in our media environment so you can’t just spew disinformation and misinformation.” without any negative reaction? What is the disinformation and misinformation she is speaking of? Is she aware that there are currently laws on the books that forbid media outlets from writing or broadcasting known or proven lies?

Still on Cortez NBC News reported on January 26, 2019 that Cortez answered a question on 60 Minutes about how she would pay for her proposed green new deal by pointing out that in the mid-20th century marginal tax rates were “as high as 60 percent or 70 percent.” The NBC story continued that, “a slew of articles have since debated wether higher taxes would actually raise much revenue. But these articles miss the point. Taxes on the very wealthy are corrective taxes, like tobacco taxes, that should be judged by their social impact, not simply their revenues. The purpose of high tax rates on the rich is the reduction of vast fortunes that give a handful of people a level of power incompatible with democracy.” Does anybody else question if this is legal? Does that sound like Democracy or Socialism to you?

The same NBC story reported that Sen. Elizabeth Warren had announced a new “wealth tax.” Bernie Sanders and Senator Cory Booker were also mentioned as favoring taxes on the rich. I feel targeting a certain group is acceptable to many people, as long as it is not a group they are a member of. I wonder, out loud, if these “corrective” taxes that are designed to bring the very rich in line with the rest of us might one day be expanded. How does taxing Catholics sound? Maybe conservatives? Would it be ok to tax whites higher? What’s that old saying- They came for this group, then that group, then another group and I said nothing because I was not in those groups, but when they came for my group we were the last and there was nobody to fight for us.

Is the Project Veritas video of Michael Beller, a contracts lawyer in PBS’ general counsel office, saying, “Even if Biden wins, we go for all the Republican voters, and Homeland Security will take their children away. What do you think about that? And we’ll put them into reeducation camps.” Does that sound like an idea Russia beat us to?

How about the systemic racism we have heard about for so long? I don’t think that is a real thing, I might find it believable if they ever provided proof, but they don’t.

This has been my public service to give everyone something to talk about around the water cooler. That is, if we are ever allowed to meet around water coolers again.

If you liked this please forward it and tell your friends. If you don’t like what I have said, please comment and let me know. I suspect there is something here you disagree with.