THE PUBLIC RELATIONS WING OF THE DNC IS GOING WILD!

It seems to me that Main Stream Media (MSM) and Facebook are showing a strong bias towards the Democrats and, I believe, that could lead to big problems when the true election count is finally determined. With the end number still very much unknown considering pending court cases, incomplete state totals due to the mail in vote, electronic voting “gliches” and other problems, I am concerned about Biden being called “the president elect” in the media. In almost every article about President Trump’s pending court cases and accusations of voter fraud the MSM adds the word “unsubstantiated” despite 234 pages of affidavits the Trump Team presented to the appropriate courts.

You may recall, I say in gest, that many of our major cities were in flames recently due to riots. What do you think will happen if the court cases go in Trump’s favor? These rioters, called protesters in the MSM, will, I believe, explode in violence thanks, in part, to being told for weeks that their guy had won. I’m so old I remember when the press appeared to be unbiased. I remember when I could read a news article and not be able to figure out where the writer stood on the issue. When I was in journalism school I learned that was how a news article should be written.

When is enough enough?

Joe Biden, who is being called the president elect by the MSM, has called for cooperation and his statement is being fawned over and accepted without recognition of the fact that the election has not been settled yet, and hypocritically forgetting that many of the Democrat’s have been calling for the Republican’s president to be removed since before he was officially installed.

As a conservative, and a late to the party Trump supporter, I have sat through four years of anything but cooperation. I remember Pelosi saying no to funding for one of the biggest planks in Trump’s campaign, the wall on the border with Mexico. There was no talk of compromise or hearings, it was just NO, disregarding the wishes of millions of voters who elected Trump based, partially, on that promise. 

I remember Maxine Waters calling for her supporters to harass members of Trump’s administration when they see them in public. 

I remember what seemed like constant calls for impeachment starting even before Trump’s Inauguration Day. The day when ImpeachDonaldTrumpNow.org went live and Michael Moore addressed a group of protesters near the inauguration location. It was interesting to me that many Democrats boycotted the inauguration, as they did his state of the union address. It was also upsetting that many of the more immature Clinton supporters disrupted the ceremony by yelling from the crowd and wearing RESIST shirts. I would imagine that, if Biden does become the next president, everyone that thought that act of disrespect was acceptable four years ago would look at it differently. These same people are now saying we should cooperate. Do they see the irony of their statements?

On a regular basis broadcasters and Democratic politicians would declare that this latest abuse (name the abuse) was surely grounds for impeachment, whatever the infraction. Some of these alleged impeachable violations I found in Wikipedia were: Violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of The Constitution for accepting money from foreign dignitaries, and Russian Collusion, alleged obstruction of justice in regards to the Russian collusion claims; and accusations of “Associating the Presidency with White Nationalism, Neo Nazism and Hatred, which formed the basis of a resolution for impeachment brought on December 6, 2017. These were exaggerations of situations taken out of context and brought to maturity by our “unbiased” press.  

Maxine Waters (California Democratic Representative) seemed to be constantly looking for reasons to impeach Trump. When Trump cited Comey’s work on the Russia Investigation as one of his reasons to fire Comey Waters offered that as a reason for impeachment. Hearing her speak I don’t have any reason to suspect Representative Waters reads much, but I would have hoped that she had seen at least some of the many news articles documenting how Comey had mishandled the investigation and had, in fact, drawn the disdain of both political parties at one time or another as a result of his many errors. As the president, Trump was entitled to dismiss Comey. He did not come close to any impeachable offense, but facts don’t mean too much lately.

In September of 2019 House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D California) announced 6 committees would undertake formal impeachment inquiries after reports of controversial interactions between Trump and the country of Ukraine. This inquiry resulted in the impeachment of Donald Trump even though both he and the Ukraine President stated there was no problem with the phone call in question and there was no “Quid pro quo” which was required. An interesting add on to this (not covered in the MSM) is that VP Biden, while in office, bragged at a news conference about actually doing what the Democrats were accusing Trump of. The video is getting harder to find, but it is the one where Biden brags he told Ukraine officials they would not get the billion dollars promised to them unless they fired an investigator (Who was digging up dirt on a company Hunter Biden was working for). Later in the video Biden says, “Well son of a bitch, they did (Fire the prosecutor)” and the room erupts in laughter. That is “Quid pro quo.” Did you read about this obvious double standard in the MSM?

While Trump was not successfully prosecuted in the Senate the impeachment was an embarrassment that only two previous presidents had endured, Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998. No president has ever been convicted in the Senate and removed from office.

The Wikipedia Post cited articles in THE INDEPENDANT and THE WASHINGTON POST that appeared immediately after Trump’s inauguration those stories chronicled efforts already underway to impeach the newly elected president. That impeachment effort was based on potential conflict of interest due to Trump owning an international business and now being able to shape the foreign policy of the United States. In my opinion, this move should have been attacked by the press, it wasn’t. 

I feel it should have been attacked because the president committed no violations. He owned an international business and made deals with people in other countries as a part of that business. To even consider an impeachment based on that would be the same as arresting a person for murder because they bought a gun. I wonder if those pillars of our community who were seeking impeachment were aware that George Washington traded with the British before the Revolutionary War and continued to sell them tobacco and buy dry goods from them after the war?

In the Wikipedia article I sourced to obtain specifics on the impeachment attempts against President Trump they list the reason the Ukraine phone call was looked at as an “Impeachable” offense was that Trump was allegedly using his presidential power to undermine a rival campaign. They fail to mention that this was a legitimate inquiry Trump was making. Hunter Biden had gotten a million dollar job in a country he was not familiar with, the language was one Hunter did not speak, the job was in a field that he had no experience, and he offered no credentials other than his family name. Give me a good reason he shouldn’t have been investigated.

Since that happened the world has become aware of the fact that Hunter Biden left a computer at a store and did not pick it up or pay for it in a timely manner. The shop owner legally took possession of the computer and found evidence of child pornography and illicit business deals. The owner, responsibly, took it to the authorities (approximately one year ago) but there was no interest in building a case. There was a long delay and, finally, the case was opened and an investigation started. This story broke in late October of 2020 (I shouldn’t say it broke because it really hasn’t gotten much coverage) compare the press coverage on this to what would happen if it were Don Jr.? If you say, “We can’t compare because that hasn’t happened” then compare it to the Russia Hoax.

Ask yourself, should a story be shelved because it might hurt a presidential candidate? The strong implication here is that Hunter was successfully selling the Biden name to get high paying jobs, really high paying jobs. Some of the items found on the computer showed a pay off to “The Big Guy” who is believed to be Joe Biden- through testimony, not conjecture. How much of this did you hear before the election? Was it blown up! Was it front page! Was it low key and defensive? Everything I heard was the third, it is alleged, while it can’t be proven….Isn’t this something we should be aware of before the election? We may not want to elect a person who sells influence to other countries, just saying. 

When I was researching this I saw a Politico headline that read, “SORE LOSER OR VICTIM? TRUMP VOTERS STRUGGLE WITH PRESIDENT’S ROLE IN DEEAT. So much for due process. Has the election been certified? 

There were more.

Reuters: NO VOTING SYSTEM DELETED OR LOST VOTES IN U.S. ELECTION- SECURITY GROUPS. What about the affidavits?        Axios offered: NONE OF 2020’s WORST-CASE ELECTION SECURITY SCENARIOS CAME TO PASS. Subtitled THE ELECTION SECURITY NIGHTMARE THAT WASN’T.                                                                                                                                                          Fox News submitted: ARE PRESIDENTS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION TO CONCEDE?

I’m curious if the press we are stuck with in America would be reacting the same way if Biden had lost and yelled foul? 

I “shared” some posts about the Trump appeals. Before I could hit the share button I had to read a Facebook warning, “The U.S. has laws, procedures, and established institutions to ensure the integrity of our elections. Then below that is a recommendation to SEE ELECTION RESULTS where they tell me Biden won. My reaction was: THE U.S. HAS LAWS, PROCEDURES, AND ESTABLISHED INSTITUTIONS TO ASSURE THERE ARE NO MURDERS, but somehow we still have a bunch of them. Trump is fighting to make this a fair election. He is presenting facts that the press, sight unseen in many cases, is labeling as frivolous, unsubstantiated and more. We must all keep in mind that without fair elections we are not a Republic. 

When my re-post required a submission to the Facebook re-education camp I went to check if, maybe, they had a new policy that required a short tutorial prior to any repost. I investigated. I saw a post that said, ” A mask is better than a ventilator, Home is better than ICU, Prevention is better than cure. It’s not CURFEW it’s CARE FOR YOU. I don’t agree with that sentiment, but I checked if I would be allowed to re-post it without submitting to a re-education. There was no message attached. 

If you like this please press the subscribe button to have free access to all of my  posts. I also ask you to like, share and comment.

Thank you, Phil.